Search Result in All

The Interfaith Holy Land Ministry presents Dr. Ahlam Muhtaseb, an assistant professor at California State University, as part of its "Yearning for Peace With Justice: Four Women, Four Perspectives" series.

The Interfaith Holy Land Ministry presents speakers Zoe Batarseh and Ethel Sweed as part of its "Yearning for Peace With Justice: Four Women, Four Perspectives" series.

Please forgive me for not being able to reproduce this discussion in any better way as I did not have the right technology to record it from the receiver. However, this discussion is very informative and important. Hosted by Zafar Bangash, a renkown Muslim global movement activist. Panelists were Ali Mallah from Canadian Arab Federation, Phil Taylor, a jouranlist and Fayyaz Mehdi from Canadian Shia Muslims Organization.

In a full length video produced by the Fluoride Action Network, respected professional researchers, scientists, and health practitioners openly discuss their experience and opinions concerning the adverse health effects and ethical problems associated with the public health policy of water fluoridation. Featuring a Nobel Laureate in Medicine, three scientists from the National Research Council’s landmark review on fluoride, as well as dentists, medical doctors, and leading researchers in the field, this professionally-produced 28 minute DVD presents a powerful indictment of the water fluoridation program.

Scholar and researcher Sayyid Shahryar Naqvi explains the dire situation in the USA from the perspectives of American officials & media personalities themselves. The powers that be have decided the fate of America 2020, with economic collapse, widespread unemployment and despicable leadership, mass graves are now being dug to bury U.S citizens while the American government continues to send aid to Israel. #Covid19 #Coronavirus #FireTrump #IWasCalmUntil #COVID2019 #USA #America #AmericaFirst #MAGA #DeathToAmerica #AnthonyFauci #JeremyKonyndyk #PatrickLawrence #AndrewCuomo #NewYork #MassGraves #PeterWehner #CubeSync

Golden words of advise from Shaykh Usama Abdulghani for our free-thinking young brothers and sisters who are searching for their life partners - and also for those who are newly married and looking to read just their marital perspectives! Islam is the all-encompassing religion which teaches us compassion and mercy and helps us to live fully-enriching lives. #Marriage #Love #Quran #Ahlulbayt #Sunnah #Man #Wife #Valentines #ValentinesDay

Message of Thaqalayn \"Al-Ghadir\" and its Relevance to Islamic Unity ________________________________________ Ayatullah Murtaza Mutahhari Translated by Mojgan Jalali Vol. 3, No. 1 and 2 (1417 AH/1996 CE) The distinguished book entitled \"al-Ghadir\" has raised a huge wave in the world of Islam. Islamic thinkers shed light on the book in different perspectives; in literature, history, theology, tradition, tafsir, and sociology. From the social perspective we can deal with the Islamic unity. In this review the Islamic unity has been dealt with from a social point of view. Contemporary Muslim thinkers and reformists are of the view that unity and solidarity of Muslims are the most imperative Islamic exigencies at the present juncture when the enemies have made extensive inroads upon the Islamic community and have tried to resort to different ways and means to spread the old differences and create new ones. We are aware that Islamic unity and fraternity is the focus of attention of the Holy Legislator of Islam and is actually the major objective pursued by this Divine religion as firmed by the Qur\'an, the \"Sunnah\", and the history of Islam. For this reason, some people have been faced with this question: Wouldn\'t the compilation and publication of a book such as \"al-Ghadir\" which deals with the oldest issue of differences among the Muslims- create a barrier in the way of the sublime and lofty objective of the Islamic unity? To answer this question, it is necessary first to elucidate the essence of this issue, that is, the Islamic unity, and then proceed to examine the role of the magnum opus entitled \"al-Ghadir\"and its eminent compiler \'Allamah Amini in bringing about Islamic unity. Islamic Unity What is meant by the Islamic unity? Does it mean that one Islamic school of thought should be unanimously followed and others be set aside? Or does it mean that the commonalties of all Islamic schools of thought should be taken up and their differences be put away to make up a new denomination which is not completely the same as the previous ones? Or does it mean that Islamic unity is in no way related to the unity of the different schools of Fiqh (jurisprudence) but signifies the unity of the Muslims and the unity of the followers of different schools of Fiqh, with their different religious ideas and views, vis-a-vis the aliens? To give an illogical and impractical meaning to the issue of the Islamic unity, the opponents of the issue have called it to be the formation of a single Madhhab, so as to defeat it in the very first step. Without doubt, by the term Islamic unity, the intellectual Islamic \'Ulama\' (scholars) do not mean that all denominations should give in to one denomination or that the commonalties should be taken up and the different views and ideas be set aside, as these are neither rational and logical nor favorable and practical. By the Islamic unity these scholars mean that all Muslims should unite in one line against their common enemies. These scholars slate that Muslims have many things in common, which can serve as the foundations of a firm unity. All Muslims worship the One Almighty and believe in the Prophethood of the Holy Prophet (s). The Qur\'an is the Book of all Muslims and Ka\'abah is their \"qiblah\" (direction of prayer). They go to\"hajj\" pilgrimage with each other and perform the \"hajj\" rites and rituals like one another. They say the daily prayers and fast like each other. They establish families and engage in transactions like one another. They have similar ways of bringing up their children and burying their dead. Apart from minor affairs, they share similarities in all the aforementioned cases. Muslims also share one kind of world view, one common culture, and one grand, glorious, and long-standing civilization. Unity in the world view, in culture, in the civilization, in insight and disposition, in religious beliefs, in acts of worship and prayers, in social rites and customs can well turn the Muslim into a unified nation to serve as a massive and dominant power before which the big global powers would have to bow down. This is especially true in view of the stress laid by Islam on this principle. According to the explicit wording of the Qur\'an, the Muslims are brothers, and special rights and duties link them together. So, why shouldn\'t the Muslims use all these extensive facilities accorded to them as the blessing of Islam? This group of \'Ulama\' are of the view that there is no need for the Muslims to make any compromise on the primary or secondary principles of their religion for the sake of Islamic unity. Also it is not necessary for the Muslims to avoid engaging in discussions and reasons and writing books on primary and secondary principles about which they have differences. The only consideration for Islamic unity in this case is that the Muslims- in order to avoid the emergence or accentuation of vengeance - preserve their possession, avoid insulting and accusing each other and uttering fabrications, abandon ridiculing the logic of one another, and finally abstain from hurting one another and going beyond the borders of logic and reasoning. In fact, they should, at least, observe the limits which Islam has set forth for inviting non-Muslims to embrace it: \"Call to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good exhortation, and have disputations with them in the best manner... \"(16: 125) Some people are of the view that those schools of fiqh, such as, Shafi\'i and Hanafi which have no differences in principle should establish brotherhood and stand in one line. They believe that denominations which have differences in the principles can in no way be brothers. This group view the religious principles as an interconnected set as termed by scholars of Usul, as an interrelated and interdependent set; any damage to one principle harms all principles. As a result, those who believe in this principle are of the view that when, for instance, the principle of \"imamah\" is damaged and victimized, unity and fraternity will bear no meaning and for this reason the Shi\'ah and the Sunnis cannot shake hands as two Muslim brothers and be in the same rank, no matter who their enemy is. The first group answers this group by saying: \"There is no reason for us to consider the principles as an interrelated set and follow the principle of \"all or none\". Imam \'Ali (\'a) chose a very logical and reasonable approach. He left no stone unturned to retrieve his right. He used everything within his power to restore the principle of \"imamah\", but he never adhered to the motto of \"all or none\". \'Ali (\'a) did not rise up for his right, and that was not compulsory. On the contrary, it was a calculated and chosen approach. He did not fear death. Why didn\'t he rise up? There could have been nothing above martyrdom. Being killed for the cause of the Almighty was his ultimate desire. He was more intimate with martyrdom than a child is with his mother\'s breast. But in his sound calculations, Imam \'All (\'a) had reached the conclusion that under the existing conditions it was to the interest of Islam to foster collaboration and cooperation among the Muslims and give up revolt. He repeatedly stressed this point. In one of his letters (No.62 \"Nahj al Balaghah\") to Malik al-Ashtar, he wrote the following: \"First I pulled back my hand until I realized that a group of people converted from Islam and invited the people toward annihilating the religion of Muhammad(s). So I feared that if I did not rush to help Islam and the Muslims, I would see gaps or destruction which calamity would be far worse than the several-day-long demise of caliphate.\" In the six-man council, after appointment of \'Uthman by \'Abdul-Rahman ibn \'Awf, \'Ali (\'a) set forth his objection as well as his readiness for collaboration as follows:\" You well know that I am more deserving than others for caliphate. But now by Allah, so long as the affairs of the Muslims are in order and my rivals suffice with setting me aside and only I am alone subjected to oppression, I will not oppose (the move) and will give in (to it).\" (From Sermon 72, \"Nahj al- Balaghah\"). These indicate that in this issue \'Ali (\'a) condemned the principle of \"all or none\". There is no need to further elaborate the approach taken by \'Ali (\'a) toward this issue. There are ample historical proofs and reasons in this regard. \'Allamah Amini Now it is time to see to which group the eminent \'Allamah, Ayatullah Amini - the distinguished compiler of the \"al-Ghadir\" - belonged and how he thought. Did he approve of the unity of the Muslims only within the light of Shi\'ism? Or did he consider Islamic fraternity to be broader? Did he believe that Islam which is embraced by uttering the \"shahadatayn\" (the Muslim creed) would willy-nilly create some rights for the Muslims and that the brotherhood and fraternity set forth in the Qur\'an exists among all Muslims? \'Allamah Amini personally considered this point - i.e. the need to elucidate his viewpoint on this subject and elaborate whether\"al-Ghadir\" has a positive or a negative role in (the establishment of) Islamic unity. In order not to be subject to abuse by his opponent - be they among the pros and cons - he has repeatedly explained and elucidated his views. \'Allamah Amini supported Islamic unity and viewed an open mind and clear insight. On different occasions, he set forth this matter in various volumes of the \"al-Ghadir\'. Reference will be made to some of them below: In the preface to volume I, he briefly mentions the role of \"al-Ghadir\" in the world of Islam. He states: \"And we consider all this as service to religion, sublimation of the word of the truth, and restoration of the Islamic \'ummah\' (community).\" In volume 3 (page 77), after quoting the fabrications of Ibn Taymiyah, Alusi, and Qasimi to the effect that Shi \'ism is hostile to some of the Ahl al-Bayt (the Household of the Prophet) such as Zayd bin \'Ali bin al-Huseyn, he notes the following under the title of \"Criticism and Correction\": \"These fabrications and accusations sow the seeds of corruption, stir hostilities among the \'ummah\',create discord among the Islamic community, divide the \'ummah\', and clash with the public interests of the Muslims. Again in volume 3 (page 268), he quotes the accusation leveled on the Shi\'ahs by Sayyid Muhammad Rashid Rida to the effect that \"Shi\'ahs are pleased with any defeat incurred by Muslims, so much as they celebrated the victory of the Russians over the Muslims.\" Then he says: \"These falsehoods are fabricated by persons like Sayyid Muhammad Rashid Rida. The Shi\'ahs of Iran and Iraq against whom this accusation is leveled, as well as the orientalists, tourists, envoys of Islamic countries, and those who traveled and still travel to Iran and Iraq, have no information about this trend. Shi\'ahs, without exception, respect the lives, blood, reputation, and property of the Muslims be they Shi\'ahs or Sunnis. Whenever a calamity has befallen the Islamic community anywhere, in any region, and for any sects, the Shi\'ahs have shared their sorrow. The Shi\'ahs have never been confined to the Shi\'ah world, the (concept of) Islamic brotherhood which has been set forth in the Qur\'an and the \'sunnah\'(the Prophet\'s sayings and actions), and in this respect, no discrimination has been made between the Shi\'ahs and the Sunnis.\" Also at the close of volume 3, he criticizes several books penned by the ancients such as \"Iqd al-Farid\" by Ibn Abd al-Rabbih, \"al-Intisar\" by Abu al-Husayn Khayyat al-Mu\'tazili,\"al Farq bayn al-Firaq\" by Abu Mansur al-Baghdadi, \"al-Fasl\" by Ibn Hazm al-Andulusi, \"al-Milal wa al-Nihal\" by Muhammad ibn Abdul-Karim al-Shahristani \"Minhaj al-Sunnah\" by Ibn Taymiah and \"al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah\"by Ibn Kathir and several by the later writers such as \"Tarikh al-Umam al-Islamiyyah\" by Shaykh Muhammad Khizri, \"Fajr al Islam\" by Ahmad Amin, \"al-Jawlat fi Rubu al-Sharq al-Adna\" by Muhammad Thabit al-Mesri, \"al-Sira Bayn al-Islam wa al-Wathaniyah\" by Qasimi, and \"al- Washi\'ah\" by Musa Jarallah. Then he states the following: \"By quoting and criticizing these books, we aim at warning and awakening the Islamic \'ummah\' (to the fact) that these books create the greatest danger for the Islamic community, they destabilize the Islamic unity and scatter the Muslim lines. In fact nothing can disrupt the ranks of the Muslims, destroy their unity, and tear their Islamic fraternity more severely than these books.\" \'Allamah Amini, in the preface to volume 5, under title of\"Nazariyah Karimah\" on the occasion of a plaque of honor forwarded from Egypt for \"al-Ghadir\", clearly sets forth his view on this issue and leaves no room for any doubt. He remarks: \"People are free to express views and ideas on religion. These (views and ideas) will never tear apart the bond of Islamic brotherhood to which the holy Qur\'an has referred by stating that \'surely the believers are brethren\'; even though academic discussion and theological and religious debates reach a peak. This has been the style of the predecessors, and of the \'sahaba\' and the\'tabi\'un\', at the head of them. \"Notwithstanding all the differences that we have in the primary and secondary principles, we, the compilers and writers in nooks and corners of the world of Islam, share a common point and that is belief in the Almighty and His Prophet. A single spirit and one (form of) sentiment exists in all our bodies, and that is the spirit of Islam and the term\'ikhlas,\" \"We, the Muslim compilers, all live under the banner of truth and carry out our duties under the guidance of the Qur\'an and the Prophetic Mission of the Holy Prophet (s). The message of all of us is \'Surely the (true) religion with Allah is Islam ... (3:18)\' and the slogan of all of us is \'There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger.\' Indeed, we are (the members of) the party of Allah and the supporters of his religion. In the preface to volume 8, under the title of \"al-Ghadir Yowahhad al-Sufuf fil-Mila al-Islami\", \'Allamah Amini directly makes researches into the role of \"Al- Ghadir\" in (the establishment of) Islamic unity. In this discussion, this great scholar categorically rejects the accusations leveled by those who said: \'Al-Ghadir\' causes greater discord among the Muslims. He proves that, on the contrary, \"Al-Ghadir\"removes many misunderstandings and brings the Muslims closer to one another. Then he brings evidence by mentioning the confessions of the non-Shi\'i Islamic scholars. At the close, he quotes the letter of Shaykh Muhammad Saeed Dahduh written in this connection. To avoid prolongation of this article, we will not quote and translate the entire statements of \'Allamah Amini in explaining the positive role of \"al-Ghadir\" in (establishing) Islamic unity, since what has already been mentioned sufficiently proves this fact. The positive role of \"al-Ghadir\" is established by the facts that it firstly clarifies the proven logic of the Shi\'ahs and proves that the inclination of Muslims to Shi\'ism - notwithstanding the poisonous publicity of some people - is not due to political, ethnic, or other trends and considerations. It also verifies that a powerful logic based on the Qur\'an and the \"sunnah\" has given rise to this tendency. Secondly, it reflects that some accusations leveled on Shi\'ism - which have made other Muslims distanced from the Shi\'ah- are totally baseless and false. Examples of these accusations are the notion that the Shi\'ites prefer the non-Muslims to the non- Shi\'i Muslims, rejoice at the defeat of non-Shi\'ite Muslims at the hands of non-Muslims, and other accusations such as the idea that instead of going to hajj pilgrimage, the Shi\'ahs go on pilgrimage to shrines of the Imams, or have particular rites in prayers and in temporary marriage. Thirdly, it introduces to the world of Islam the eminent Commander of the faithful \'Ali (\'a) who is the most oppressed and the least praised grand Islamic personality and who could be the leader of all Muslims, as well as his pure offspring. Other Comments on \"al-Ghadir\" Many unbiased non-Shia Muslims interpret the \"al-Ghadir\" in the same way that has already been mentioned. Muhammad Abdul-Ghani Hasan al-Mesri, in his foreword on\"al-Ghadir\", which has been published in the preface to volume I, second edition, states: \"I call on the Almighty to make your limpid brook (in Arabic, \'Ghadir\' means brook) the cause of peace and cordiality between the Shia and Sunni brothers to cooperate with one another in building the Islamic \"ummah.\" \'Adil Ghadban, the managing editor of the Egyptian magazine entitled \"al-Kitab\", said the following in the preface to volume 3: \"This book clarifies the Shi\'ite logic. The Sunnis can correctly learn about the Shi\'i through this book. Correct recognition of the Shi\'ahs brings the views of the Shi\'ahs and the Sunnis closer, and they can make a unified rank\". In his foreword to the \"al-Ghadir\" which was published in thepreface to volume 4, Dr. Muhammad Ghallab, professor of philosophy at the Faculty of Religious Studies al-Azhar University said: \"I got hold of your book at a very opportune time, because right now I am busy collecting and compiling a book on the lives of the Muslims from various perspectives. Therefore, I am highly avidfor obtaining sound information about \'Imamiyah\' Shi\'ism. Your book will help me. And I will not make mistakes about the Shi\'ahs as others have\". In this foreword published in the preface to volume 4 of the\"al-Ghadir\", Dr. \'Abdul-Rahman Kiali Halabi says the following after referring to the decline of the Muslims in the present age and the factors which can lead to the Muslims\' salvation, one of which is the sound recognition of the successor of the Holy Prophet (s): \"The book entitled \"al-Ghadir\" and its rich content deserves to be known by every Muslim to learn how historians have been negligent and see where the truth lies. Through this means, we should compensate for the past, and by striving to foster the unity of the Muslims, we should try to gain the due rewards\". These were the views of \'Allamah Amini about the important social issues of our age and such were his sound reflections in the world of Islam. Peace be upon him. Text Source: http://www.al-islam.org/mot/default.asp?url=ghadir-relevance.htm

Muslim women face many challenges in western society especially with regards to hijab. This short video shows some challenges that muslim women face and their views. They view hijab as a symbol of purity and liberation.

This documentary was produced BBC. So, a number of incidents and perspectives may not be in accordance with reality. Some incidents are true but the way they are presented may have Western Media Bias. Overall a very good documentary.

This documentary was produced BBC. So, a number of incidents and perspectives may not be in accordance with reality. Some incidents are true but the way they are presented may have Western Media Bias. Overall a very good documentary.

This documentary was produced BBC. So, a number of incidents and perspectives may not be in accordance with reality. Some incidents are true but the way they are presented may have Western Media Bias. Overall a very good documentary.

Diskussion om Hijab En diskussion som tar upp slöjan (Hijab) ur olika perspektiv med argument för och emot. Talk about Hijab A discussion that addresses the veil (Hijab) from different perspectives with the arguments for and against.

An interview of Alan Hart, a British author and journalist, by Maksud Djavadov of Crescent International. Part 1 of 3.

An interview of Alan Hart, a British author and journalist, by Maksud Djavadov of Crescent International. Part 2 of 3.

An interview of Alan Hart, a British author and journalist, by Maksud Djavadov of Crescent International. Part 3 of 3.

Not many people will go through all the leaked documents. They will mostly hear what the mainstream media and political groups choose to focus on. In this clip Ray McGovern argues that The New York Times ignores intelligence that there is no evidence of Iran nuclear weapons program. --- One should not discount the possibility of a good number of forged and fragmented documents intentionally released to the Wikileaks by government apparatuses. That reason alone is enough to suggest that the Wikileaks cannot be a measure of truth per se, but it is the perspective with which one judges its content, and since there can be multiple perspectives, the truth of these leaks will remain contested. Further, the accuracy of some documents in the leaks should not be taken as a verification of the accuracy of the rest of the documents. On the question of verification, the Wikileaks website itself suggests that, the "simplest and most effective countermeasure is a worldwide community of informed users and editors who can scrutinize and discuss leaked documents.” Lastly, in any review of these leaks, one should also interrogate the sources used and the background and politics of the people working for the Wikileaks. Because these considerations have a huge impact on what the Wikileaks editors choose to release (and what they do not), their timing, and their targets. Perhaps, their politics and agenda will become clearer with the release of more leaked documents.

[29 April 2012] UNRWA; Empowering Palestinian Youth Refugees - Remember Palestine - English A two-day international conference on "Engaging Youth: Palestine Refugees in a Changing Middle East" convened by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), concluded on the 20th of April in Brussels with UNRWA Commissioner-General, Filippo Grandi, unveiling ten "Youth Commitments" on behalf of the UN Agency. The commitments also included enhanced vocational training and micro-finance opportunities, fundraising for scholarships, expanding its successful skills programme for young refugees first piloted in Syria, advocacy on rights of special concern to youth. The idea of the conference was to increase Youth participation, economically empowering refugee youth, building and investing in human capital, and youth confronting marginalisation. The edition of the show will focus on the perspectives of youth Palestinians and how the new generations of Palestinians refuges manage pending inherited issues as their right to return and how organizations like the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) can help to empower them.

The following is the full text of Ayatollah Khamenei’s inaugural address delivered on August 30, 2012 at the 16th Non-Aligned Summit in Tehran. In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful All praise belongs to Allah, the Lord of the Two Worlds, and may peace and blessings be upon the greatest and trustworthy Messenger and on his pure progeny, his select companions, and all the prophets and divine envoys. I welcome you honorable guests, the leaders and delegations representing the member states of the Non-Aligned Movement, and all the other participants of this great international summit. We have gathered here to continue a movement with God’s guidance and assistance and to give it new life and momentum on the basis of the current conditions and needs in the world. The movement was founded almost six decades ago thanks to the intelligence and courage of a few caring and responsible political leaders who were aware of the conditions and circumstances of their time. Our guests have gathered here from different geographical locations, far and near, and they belong to different nationalities and races with different ideological, cultural and historical characteristics, but just as Ahmad Sukarno, one of the founders of this movement said in the famous Bandung Conference in the year 1955, the basis of establishing the Non-Aligned Movement is not geographical or racial and religious unity, but rather unity of needs. At that time, the member states of the Non-Aligned Movement were in need of a bond that could safeguard them against authoritarian, arrogant and insatiable networks and today with the progress and spread of the instruments of hegemony, this need still exists. I would like to point out another truth. Islam has taught us that in spite of their racial, linguistic and cultural differences, human beings share the same nature, which calls them to purity, justice, benevolence, compassion and cooperation. It is this universal human nature which – if it can safely steer away from misleading motives – guides human beings to monotheism and understanding of God’s transcendent essence. This brilliant truth has such potential that it can form the foundation of societies which are free and proud and at the same time enjoy progress and justice. It can extend the light of spirituality to all material and worldly endeavors of humankind and it can create a paradise on earth for human beings in advance of the other-worldly paradise, which has been promised by divine religions. And it is this common and universal truth that can form the foundations of brotherly cooperation among the nations that do not share any similarities in terms of outward structures, historical background and geographical location. Whenever international cooperation is based on such a foundation, governments will build their relationships with each other not on the basis of fear and threats, or greed and unilateral interests, or mediation of treasonous and venal individuals, but on the basis of wholesome and shared interests and more importantly, the interests of humanity. In this way, governments can relieve their awakened consciences and put the minds of their peoples at ease. This values-based order is the exact opposite of the hegemony-based order, which has been upheld, propagandized and led by hegemonic Western powers in the recent centuries and by the domineering and aggressive government of America today. Dear guests, today after the passage of nearly six decades, the main values of the Non-Aligned Movement remain alive and steady: values such as anti-colonialism, political, economic and cultural independence, non-alignment with any power blocs, and improving solidarity and cooperation among the member states. The realities of today’s world fall short of those values, but the collective will and comprehensive efforts to change the existing realities and achieve these values, though full of challenges, are promising and rewarding. In the recent past, we have been witness to the failure of the policies of the Cold War era and the unilateralism that followed it. Having learnt lessons from this historical experience, the world is in transition towards a new international order and the Non-Aligned Movement can and should play a new role. This new order should be based on the participation of all nations and equal rights for all of them. And as members of this movement, our solidarity is an obvious necessity in the current era for establishing this new order. Fortunately, the outlook of global developments promises a multi-faceted system in which the traditional power blocs are replaced with a group of countries, cultures and civilizations from different economic, social and political origins. The striking events that we have witnessed over the past three decades clearly show that the emergence of new powers has coincided with the decline of the traditional powers. This gradual transition of power provides the non-aligned countries with an opportunity to play a significant and worthy role on the world stage and prepare the ground for a just and truly participatory global management. In spite of varying perspectives and orientations, we member states of this movement have managed to preserve our solidarity and bond over a long period of time within the framework of the shared values and this is not a simple and small achievement. This bond can prepare the ground for transitioning to a just and humane order. Current global conditions provide the Non-Aligned Movement with an opportunity that might never arise again. Our view is that the control room of the world should not be managed by the dictatorial will of a few Western countries. It should be possible to establish and ensure a participatory system for managing international affairs, one that is global and democratic. This is what is needed by all the countries that have been directly or indirectly harmed as a result of the transgression of a few bullying and hegemonic countries. The UN Security Council has an illogical, unjust and completely undemocratic structure and mechanism. This is a flagrant form of dictatorship, which is antiquated and obsolete and whose expiry date has passed. It is through abusing this improper mechanism that America and its accomplices have managed to disguise their bullying as noble concepts and impose it on the world. They protect the interests of the West in the name of “human rights”. They interfere militarily in other countries in the name of “democracy”. They target defenseless people in villages and cities with their bombs and weapons in the name of “combating terrorism”. From their perspective, humanity is divided into first-, second- and third-class citizens. Human life is considered cheap in Asia, Africa and Latin America, and expensive in America and Western Europe. The security of America and Europe is considered important, while the security of the rest of humanity is considered unimportant. Torture and assassination are permissible and completely ignored if they are carried out by America, the Zionists and their puppets. It does not trouble their conscience that they have secret prisons in various places on different continents, in which defenseless prisoners who have no legal representation and have not been tried in a court of law are treated in the most hideous and detestable way. Good and evil are defined in a completely one-sided and selective way. They impose their interests on the nations of the world in the name of “international law”. They impose their domineering and illegal demands in the name of “international community”. Using their exclusive and organized media network, they disguise their lies as the truth, their falsehood as true, and their oppression as efforts to promote justice. In contrast, they brand as lies every true statement that exposes their deceit and label every legitimate demand as roguish. Friends, this flawed and harmful situation cannot continue. Everybody has become tired of this faulty international structure. The 99 percent movement of the American people against the centers of wealth and power in America and the widespread protests of the people in Western Europe against the economic policies of their governments show that the people are losing their patience with this situation. It is necessary to remedy this irrational situation. Firm, logical and comprehensive bonds between member states of the Non-Aligned Movement can play an important role in finding a remedy. Honorable audience, international peace and security are among the critical issues of today’s world and the elimination of catastrophic weapons of mass destruction is an urgent necessity and a universal demand. In today’s world, security is a shared need where there is no room for discrimination. Those who stockpile their anti-human weapons in their arsenals do not have the right to declare themselves as standard-bearers of global security. Undoubtedly, this will not bring about security for themselves either. It is most unfortunate to see that countries possessing the largest nuclear arsenals have no serious and genuine intention of removing these deadly weapons from their military doctrines and they still consider such weapons as an instrument that dispels threats and as an important standard that defines their political and international position. This conception needs to be completely rejected and condemned. Nuclear weapons neither ensure security, nor do they consolidate political power, rather they are a threat to both security and political power. The events that took place in the 1990s showed that the possession of such weapons could not even safeguard a regime like the former Soviet Union. And today we see certain countries which are exposed to waves of deadly insecurity despite possessing atomic bombs. The Islamic Republic of Iran considers the use of nuclear, chemical and similar weapons as a great and unforgivable sin. We proposed the idea of “Middle East free of nuclear weapons” and we are committed to it. This does not mean forgoing our right to peaceful use of nuclear power and production of nuclear fuel. On the basis of international laws, peaceful use of nuclear energy is a right of every country. All should be able to employ this wholesome source of energy for various vital uses for the benefit of their country and people, without having to depend on others for exercising this right. Some Western countries, themselves possessing nuclear weapons and guilty of this illegal action, want to monopolize the production of nuclear fuel. Surreptitious moves are under way to consolidate a permanent monopoly over production and sale of nuclear fuel in centers carrying an international label but in fact within the control of a few Western countries. A bitter irony of our era is that the U.S. government, which possesses the largest and deadliest stockpiles of nuclear arms and other weapons of mass destruction and the only country guilty of its use, is today eager to carry the banner of opposition to nuclear proliferation. The U.S. and its Western allies have armed the usurper Zionist regime with nuclear weapons and created a major threat for this sensitive region. Yet the same deceitful group does not tolerate the peaceful use of nuclear energy by independent countries, and even opposes, with all its strength, the production of nuclear fuel for radiopharmaceuticals and other peaceful and humane purposes. Their pretext is fear of production of nuclear weapons. In the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, they themselves know that they are lying, but lies are sanctioned by the kind of politics that is completely devoid of the slightest trace of spirituality. One who makes nuclear threats in the 21st century and does not feel ashamed, will he feel ashamed of lying? I stress that the Islamic Republic has never been after nuclear weapons and that it will never give up the right of its people to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Our motto is: “Nuclear energy for all and nuclear weapons for none.” We will insist on each of these two precepts, and we know that breaking the monopoly of certain Western countries on production of nuclear energy in the framework of the Non-Proliferation Treaty is in the interest of all independent countries, including the members of the Non-Aligned Movement. The Islamic Republic\\\\\\\'s successful experience in resistance against the bullying and comprehensive pressures by America and its accomplices has firmly convinced it that the resistance of a unified and firmly determined nation can overcome all enmities and hostilities and open a glorious path to its lofty goals. The comprehensive advances made by our country in the last two decades are facts for all to see, as repeatedly attested by official international observers. All this has happened under sanctions, economic pressures and propaganda campaigns by networks affiliated with America and Zionism. The sanctions, which were regarded as paralyzing by nonsensical commentators, not only did not and will not paralyze us, but have made our steps steadier, elevated our resolve and strengthened our confidence in the correctness of our analyses and the inborn capacities of our nation. We have with our own eyes repeatedly witnessed divine assistance in these challenges. Honored guests, I deem it necessary to speak about a very important issue, which though related to our region has dimensions extending far beyond it and which has influenced global policies for several decades. This issue is the agonizing issue of Palestine. The summary of this matter is that on the basis of a horrible Western plot and under the direction of England in the 1940s, an independent country with a clear historical identity called “Palestine” has been taken away from its people through the use of weapons, killings and deception and has been given to a group of people the majority of whom are immigrants from European countries. This great usurpation – which at the outset was accompanied with massacres of defenseless people in towns and villages and their expulsion from their homes and homeland to bordering countries – has continued for more than six decades with similar crimes and continues to this very day. This is one of the most important issues of the human community. Political and military leaders of the usurping Zionist regime have not avoided any crimes during this time: from killing the people, destroying their homes and farms and arresting and torturing men and women and even their children, to humiliating and insulting that nation and trying to destroy it in order to digest it in the haraam-eating stomach of the Zionist regime, to attacking their refugee camps in Palestine itself and in the neighboring countries where millions of refugees live. Such names as Sabra and Shatila, Qana and Deir Yasin have been etched in the history of our region with the blood of the oppressed Palestinian people. Even now after 65 years the same kind of crimes marks the treatment of Palestinians remaining in the occupied territories by the ferocious Zionist wolves. They commit new crimes one after the other and create new crises for the region. Hardly a day passes without reports of murder, injury and arrests of the youth who stand up to defend their homeland and their honor and protest against the destruction of their farms and homes. The Zionist regime, which has carried out assassinations and caused conflicts and crimes for decades by waging disastrous wars, killing people, occupying Arab territories and organizing state terror in the region and in the world, labels the Palestinian people as “terrorists”, the people who have stood up to fight for their rights. And the media networks which belong to Zionism and many of the Western and mercenary media repeat this great lie in violation of ethical values and journalistic commitment, and the political leaders who claim to defend human rights have closed their eyes on all these crimes and support that criminal regime shamelessly and boldly and assume the role of their advocates. Our standpoint is that Palestine belongs to the Palestinians and that continuing its occupation is a great and intolerable injustice and a major threat to global peace and security. All solutions suggested and followed up by the Westerners and their affiliates for “resolving the problem of Palestine” have been wrong and unsuccessful, and it will remain so in the future. We have put forth a just and entirely democratic solution. All the Palestinians – both the current citizens of Palestine and those who have been forced to immigrate to other countries but have preserved their Palestinian identity, including Muslims, Christians and Jews – should take part in a carefully supervised and confidence-building referendum and chose the political system of their country, and all the Palestinians who have suffered from years of exile should return to their country and take part in this referendum and then help draft a Constitution and hold elections. Peace will then be established. Now I would like to give a benevolent piece of advice to American politicians who always stood up to defend and support the Zionist regime. So far, this regime has created countless problems for you. It has presented a hateful image of you to the regional peoples, and it has made you look like an accomplice in the crimes of the usurping Zionists. The material and moral costs borne by the American government and people on account of this are staggering, and if this continues, the costs might become even heavier in the future. Think about the Islamic Republic\\\\\\\'s proposal of a referendum and with a courageous decision, rescue yourselves from the current impossible situation. Undoubtedly, the people of the region and all free-thinkers across the world will welcome this measure. Honorable guests, now I would like to return to my initial point. Global conditions are sensitive and the world is passing through a crucial historical juncture. It is anticipated that a new order shall be born. The Non-Aligned Movement, which includes almost two-thirds of the world community, can play a major role in shaping that future. The holding of this major conference in Tehran is itself a significant event to be taken into consideration. By pooling our resources and capacities, we members of this movement can create a new historic and lasting role towards rescuing the world from insecurity, war and hegemony. This goal can be achieved only through our comprehensive cooperation with each other. There are among us quite a few countries that are very wealthy and countries that enjoy international influence. It is completely possible to find solutions for problems through economic and media cooperation and through passing on experiences that help us improve and make progress. We need to strengthen our determination. We need to remain faithful to our goals. We should not fear the bullying powers when they frown at us, nor should we become happy when they smile at us. We should consider the will of God and the laws of creation as our support. We should learn lessons from what happened to the communist camp two decades ago and from the failure of the policies of so-called “Western liberal democracy” at the present time, whose signs can be seen by everybody in the streets of European countries and America and in the insoluble economic problems of these countries. And finally, we should consider the Islamic Awakening in the region and the fall of the dictatorships in North Africa, which were dependent on America and were accomplices to the Zionist regime, as a great opportunity. We can help improve the “political productivity” of the Non-Aligned Movement in global governance. We can prepare a historic document aimed to bring about a change in this governance and to provide for its administrative tools. We can plan for effective economic cooperation and define paradigms for cultural relationships among ourselves. Undoubtedly, establishing an active and motivated secretariat for this organization will be a great and significant help in achieving these goals. Thank you.

The following is the full text of the speech delivered on July 23, 2014 by Ayatollah Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, in a meeting with students. The meeting was held on the eve of Quds Day. In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, and peace and greetings be upon our Master and Prophet, Muhammad, and upon his immaculate household I thank Allah the Exalted because at this point in time our country is witness to a group of young, religious, enthusiastic, motivated, reasonable and thoughtful people. Today, our meeting was a very good meeting. This matter has two parts: one is related to the details of the statements that the friends madew in this meeting. Well, good and valuable statements were made. It is possible that this humble person agrees or disagrees with these statements. The issue of content is one part of the issue. In my opinion, the part that is important and praiseworthy is the enthusiastic and inquiring spirit of students. This showed itself in the statements of the students who delivered a speech. This is important. It is possible that some of the requests that these students made are reasonable and that some are not reasonable, achievable and acceptable. But the essence of this inquiring spirit and this motivation for wanting, thinking, suggesting and criticizing is perfect. Of course, one should observe morality, piety and religious obligations in all affairs. We should avoid unfair statements. We should avoid baseless and unsubstantiated statements. These points are important in their own respect, but what is of primary importance is that our young students should be inquiring, motivated, enthusiastic, present on the scene and attentive to the issues of the country. Well, let us spend a few minutes discussing some of the issues that the friends raised in the meeting. The first issue is what I just said. I became happy with the spirit that exists in our young students - most of whom are representatives of student groups - and I thank God because one can feel that they enjoy enthusiasm, new ideas, motivation and an inquiring spirit. I hope that by Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s favor, this spirit remains in you until you will be in charge of affairs because in the future, you will be officials in charge of affairs and you will be the managers of the country. I hope that by Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s favor, this spirit and this critical, inquiring, responsible and dutiful outlook remains in you. If this happens, the country will be saved. The friends in the meeting raised a number of issues which, in my opinion, are noteworthy and important. The issue of \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"knowledge for the sake of knowledge without paying attention to its benefits for the country\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" - which was raised by a number of friends - is completely correct and we have repeatedly brought it up as well. Today, scientific work and endeavor in the country and in our universities and research centers is a lively, successful and praiseworthy endeavor. However, everyone should pay attention that knowledge is an introduction to action. Valuable knowledge is the kind of knowledge that helps the country and that is useful for solving its problems. Mere publication of our articles in, say, ISI journals and other such journals - even if they become a reference point - is not an ideal although it is praiseworthy in terms of knowledge. Scientific work should address the needs of the country. This was mentioned by the friends in this meeting as well and I would like to stress it. The officials and high-ranking managers in charge of higher education are present in this meeting. I hope that by Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s favor, they pay attention to this point. There was another point in the statements of the friends which was correct. I too would like to place emphasis on it. This point is the relationship between methods of economic management and the culture of society. The idea that we brought up the issue of cultural invasion in the 1370s while the invasion was economic is completely correct. We do not reject this, but our outlook on knowledge as an original and vital issue should receive everyone\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s attention at any level. At that time too, certain complaints were made about the methods of economic management. However, what was important and what is important today is our outlook on cultural orientations. Of course, we agree that the methods of economic management have certain effects on culture, but the opposite is true as well. An issue that was discussed as a peripheral issue - but that is not peripheral to me and that is an important issue - is the issue of youth\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s marriage [students laugh and make noises indicating support]. We knew that you would have such a reaction to this issue. The issue of youth\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s marriage is an important issue. I fear that this indifferent outlook towards the issue of marriage - unfortunately, this indifferent outlook exists more or less today - will have terrible consequences for the future of the country. You brought up the issue of military service, but in my opinion, the issue of military service is not a difficult issue. It is possible to think about and work on this issue. The solution for the problem of military service as an obstacle in the way of marriage is not that we shorten the term. We can adopt other methods for this problem, but it remains an issue. Motivation for marriage should turn into a practical measure. That is to say, marriage should be promoted. Allah the Exalted says, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"If they are in poverty, Allah will give them means out of His grace\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" [The Holy Quran, 24: 32]. This is a divine promise. We should trust this promise as we trust other divine promises. Marriage and starting a family has not made and will not make individuals experience hard living conditions. This means that one does not necessarily go through rough times because of marriage- on the contrary- marriage may solve the problems of individuals. The academic environment is a good and appropriate environment for preparing the ground for marriage. In my opinion, youth themselves, their families and officials in charge of universities should think about and make a decision about the issue of youth\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s marriage. We should not allow the age of marriage - which has unfortunately gone up today, particularly among women - to continue going up. There are certain wrong notions and traditions that are highly problematic. These wrong traditions are an obstacle in the way of promoting marriage among youth. Therefore, they should be practically broken. In my opinion, you - who are young, inquiring and enthusiastic and you who suggest breaking many habits and traditions - you should break the wrong traditions that exist on the issue of marriage. This is another issue that I deem necessary to stress. Of course, it was common in the past for a number of well-intentioned matchmakers and religious individuals to act as intermediaries and to introduce eligible women and men to one another. In this way, they helped them get married. Such tasks should be carried out. There should really be a movement in society in this regard. Another point that was witnessed in the statements of the friends in the meeting - this point also existed in the questions that students asked me indirectly - is about the compatibility between the political positions of students or student groups, and the viewpoints of the Leadership. Before this meeting, students had been asked: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"What would you say if you were present in this meeting?\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" We have received certain answers. They brought us a book that contained 100 - or even more - pages. This book is about the opinions of students. I saw in the book that this question has been posed. And in this meeting, it was posed in a different way. In my opinion, this is not a very good and reasonable question. It is not the case that all the positions that people from different social backgrounds - including students who are among the leading groups among the people - adopt should be a copy of the viewpoints that the Leadership puts forward. This is not the case. As Muslims and as religious and thoughtful individuals, you should take a careful look in order to perceive your responsibilities and to make your own analyses. I will expand on this later on. You should adopt a position and express your viewpoints about individuals, orientations, policies and governments. It is not the case that you should wait and see what position the Leadership adopts about such and such an individual, movement, measure and policy so that you adopt your position on the basis of this position. This will lock affairs up. The Leadership has certain responsibilities. If Allah the Exalted helps him and bestows His blessings on him, he will carry them out. You too have certain responsibilities. You should look at the scene and make your own decisions. However, the standard should be piety. The standard should be piety. Piety means exercising self-restraint in supporting or opposing someone and in criticizing or praising someone. You should observe piety. If it is observed, then both criticizing, and supporting and praising people is good no matter if it is an individual, an administration, a political orientation or a political event that you criticize or support. There is nothing wrong with this criticism and support. Of course, if this humble person expresses his viewpoint about an issue, it is possible that it influences the decision of those who have trust in him and who accept this viewpoint. However, this does not mean that individuals should be absolved of responsibilities and opinions. This is not what I mean. Everyone should take a look and carry out their responsibility. As I said, the standard is that piety should be observed. That is to say, if we make a criticism, if we support someone, if we approve of a movement and a policy or if we reject it, this should really be done out of a sense of responsibility and without engaging our personal interests and temptations. This is another point. One of the friends in the meeting said that students have lost sleep over a certain issue. If concerns make students be so sensitive, this is very good. Of course, we hope that you get enough sleep and go to sleep on time! The expression \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"I have lost sleep over something\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" is a very good expression. If this is really the case, we become very happy. This feeling of worry and anxiety about different issues makes you look at issues with open eyes. As for what I have written down to discuss, it has two, three parts and I will discuss each part by paying attention to our time. First of all, we should consider students to be among those individuals who manifest the vigilant conscience of a people and a country. Of course, this is the truth of the matter. If students launch a movement in a society and if they make a move and a request, this shows the general orientation of that society. This is the case all over the world. Students are, in fact, among those groups of people who show the vigilant conscience and orientation of a nation. Therefore, students should pay attention to issues in a very wise way. They should know their conditions and their environment. They should know threats, opportunities, enemies and enmities. Of course, we do not expect students to forget about their lessons and different affairs in order to engage in political work only. This is not what we expect them to do. Rather, we expect them to look at issues with open eyes, with a clear outlook, with a sense of responsibility and with a high motivation. This is our expectation of students. Some of the issues that we are faced with today are issues related to our surrounding environment and to the region. Regional issues are not separate from the issues of the country. Today, one important and fundamental issue is the issue of Palestine and Gaza. Well, the issue of Gaza and the disasters that have befallen the people of Gaza today and that have a long history should receive our attention from two perspectives: one perspective is that this shows the truth of the Zionist regime. This is the Zionist regime. In my opinion, this is not the important part of the issue. The Zionist regime is a regime that has set itself the goal of showing blatant violence since the beginning of its illegitimate birth. They do not even deny this violence. They have set themselves the goal of clenching an iron fist. They say this everywhere and they are proud of it. This is their policy. Since the year 1948 - when this fake regime came into being officially - until today, they have been pursuing this policy. It is 66 years now that they have been pursuing this policy. Of course, it had committed many crimes in Palestine even before it was officially recognized and even before colonialists imposed it on the world and on the region. But during these 66 years, they did whatever they could as a government and as a political system. They committed any violent act that one can think a government can do to a people. And they have no scruples whatsoever. This is the truth of the Zionist regime. There is no cure for this except the annihilation of this regime. Annihilating the Zionist regime does not at all mean massacring the Jewish people in the region. The logical statement that our magnanimous Imam (r.a.) made - that Israel should be annihilated - is based on a human principle. We presented to the world the practical solution for this and no one could criticize it in a reasonable way. We said that a poll and a referendum should be conducted so that the people who live in, come from and belong to this region determine who should rule over it. We said that the people should resolve this issue. This is the meaning of annihilating the Zionist regime. This is the solution. This is a solution that is understandable and favored by today\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s standards of logic in the world. This is a practical solution. We even put forward a proposal to the United Nations and a number of international organizations in charge of such affairs. And this proposal was discussed by them. There is no cure for the problem that this savage and wolfish regime - whose policy is to behave towards people with iron fists, cruelty and savagery and that does not care about and deny killing people and children, attacking different regions and causing destruction - has created except its destruction and annihilation. If, by Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s favor, that day comes and if it is annihilated, then so much the better. But what is the cure as long as this fake regime survives? The cure is decisive and militant resistance against this regime. The Palestinians should display power in the face of the Zionist regime. No one should think that if it had not been for the missiles of Gaza, the Zionist regime would have stopped their incursions. This is not the case. Notice what they are doing in the West Bank. This is while there is no missile, weapon and gun in the West Bank. The only weapon that the people have there is stones. Notice what the Zionist regime is doing there. It is doing whatever it can. It destroys people\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s homes, it destroys their gardens, it destroys their lives and it humiliates and belittles them. If it is necessary, it closes water on them and it blacks out electricity. The Zionists could not tolerate someone like Yasser Arafat who compromised with them. They besieged, humiliated, poisoned and destroyed him. It is not the case that if we do not display power in the face of the Zionists, they will tolerate and show mercy to people and observe their rights. This is not the case at all. The only cure that exists before the Zionist regime is annihilated is that the Palestinians manage to act in a powerful way. If they act in a powerful way, it is possible that the other side - which is this wolfish and violent regime - will retreat, as they are looking for a truce with all their power. This means that they have become desperate. They kill people and children and they show cruelty in an excessive way. But they are desperate as well. They are in dire straits and this is why they are after a truce. Therefore, we believe that the West Bank should become armed like Gaza. It is necessary to show power. Those people who are interested in the fate of Palestine should do whatever they can. This is what should be done: the people in the West Bank should become armed as well. The only thing that can alleviate the Palestinians\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' pains is to show power. Otherwise, if we act in a tame, subservient and obedient way, nothing that is to the advantage of the Palestinians will be done and the violence that this violent, malevolent and wolfish creature is showing will not decrease. Today, the responsibility of people all over the world is political support. There is no doubt about this. As you can see, there are popular movements in Islamic and even non-Islamic countries. By Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s favor, the world will witness the loud and great voice of the people of Iran on Quds Day. God willing, on Quds Day, the people of Iran will show how motivated they are about Palestine. Of course, some people wanted to show the opposite of this with the slogan \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"neither Gaza nor Lebanon\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\". They are wrong. The people of Iran believe in defending the oppressed: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Be an enemy of the oppressor and helper of the oppressed\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" [Nahjul Balaghah, Letter 47]. This is what the people of Iran want and by Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s favor, it will be shown. This is one perspective about the issue of Gaza. This is important and great emphasis should be placed on it. Today, western imperialist powers - that is to say, a few large, rich and powerful western powers which are headed by America and malevolent England behind it - have stood firm in order to defend this usurping, oppressive and cold-hearted regime. This is a very important issue. They are supporting it openly. What are they supporting? They are supporting a creator of disasters and no ordinary and fair-minded person can accept any indifference towards these crimes. A small area and a piece of land named Gaza is being attacked by airplanes, missiles, armies and tanks. They have used all kinds of munitions on these people. This is really an astonishing event. So many children are being killed, so many houses are being destroyed and people\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s lives are being accompanied by so much bitterness, cruelty and torture. This is while these so-called gentlemen are supporting it. With what reason do they support this regime? They support it with the stupid reason that the President of America gives. He says, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Israel has the right to ensure its own security\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\". Well, do the Palestinians not have the right to ensure their security? Is it acceptable for a government to threaten the lives of a people who have been cruelly besieged by it and who show no reaction? Does anyone accept this? How will history judge this reason? The officials of these arrogant countries do not understand what they are doing - with these kinds of support - to their dignity and the dignity of their countries and regimes in history. They stand up with complete shamelessness and say that they support Israel. They do not at all point to the events that are happening in the region and to the disasters that this destructive and dangerous element is creating. This shows that today, the logic of liberal democracy - the logic and the intellectual system on the basis of which western countries are ruled and controlled - does not benefit from the slightest moral value. There is not any moral value and humane feeling in it. In fact, they are disgracing themselves. They are disgracing themselves in the face of the critical look of nations throughout the world, whether those who live in the present time or those who will live in the future. We should preserve this as an important experience for ourselves and we should know America. This is liberal democracy. This will and should influence our actions, our judgment and our behavior. This is the camp - that is to say, the government of the United States of America and its followers - that has stood up against the Islamic Republic today and that has challenged the Islamic Republic in different events. This is the truth about them. The truth about them is this: not only do they not show any sensitivity about the massacre of human beings and defenseless people but they also defend and support oppressors and perpetrators of appalling and great crimes - such as what is happening in Gaza today. This should be a standard for us. The people of Iran, our intellectual apparatus, our students and our broad-minded personalities should not forget this. This is America. This is western power and its intellectual basis - which is liberal democracy. Today, it is this intellectual basis that is confronting the Islamic system. Today, the politicians who are most indifferent to human rights are those who are in charge of managing these countries. They do not at all believe in human beings, human rights and human principles. Their behavior in Gaza and other such events is proving this. They do not at all believe in human rights, human dignity and respect, people\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s votes and anything else. The only thing that they believe in is money and bullying. There is no other reason for their behavior. In my opinion, whatever comes out of their mouths about the issue of freedom, human rights and other such things is a travesty of freedom and human rights. Well, we are not saying this as a piece of advice to America, the President of America and American politicians. It is clear [that they do not listen]. We are saying this for ourselves so that when we want to carry out an analysis, make a judgment and adopt a measure, we understand who we are dealing with and who the people we are faced with are. We are saying this so that we know what exists at the bottom of their thoughts. We should determine our responsibilities. What is important is that we should have a correct analysis of the west\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s behavior in the present time. Their confrontation with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Islamic Revolution and the Islamic movement and Awakening is part of their major polices. The major policy of global arrogance is enslaving nations and dominating their fate without paying the least attention to their interests and requests. This is the major policy of arrogance and we should pay attention to it. Anti-American, anti-western and anti-arrogance slogans in our country reflect this truth. Some people should not immediately jump to the conclusion that a biased or completely unreasonable task is being carried out as soon as they hear an anti-western or anti-American slogan. They should not think like this because this is not the case. This anti-western and anti-American outlook in the Islamic Revolution is based on a correct experience, outlook and calculation. On that day, I said to the executive officials and decision-makers of the country that the main goal of the enemy is to create disruption in our calculation system. When one\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s calculation system is disrupted, it produces wrong outputs out of correct inputs. That is to say, experiences will no longer be useful to it. When our calculation system does not function properly and correctly and when calculation is not carried out in the right way, experiences will no longer be beneficial. Notice how westerners and the leaders of the current western civilization have treated our country during the past 80, 90, 100 years. We have a long experience of receiving blows from the west. There are some people in the country - some western-oriented, westernized and westoxicated individuals - who witness these experiences in front of their eyes, but who do not learn a lesson from them. Well, they saw that westerners brought Reza Khan to power and helped him dominate the country. As a result of this, a bizarre Reza Khani dictatorship was established in the country by the English. They helped a thuggish and unreasonable person who was completely indifferent to the principles of the country. Afterwards during the 1320s, the same powers came and occupied Iran. In fact, they divided it among themselves in one sense. The same powers looted our oil and imposed cruel contracts on this country. The same powers launched the coup d\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'état of the 28th of Mordad and overthrew and destroyed a national government which originated from the votes of the people despite all its flaws. The same powers made our national oil movement deviate from its path and consequently, they once more dominated our natural and material sources. The same powers established Mohammad Reza\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s dictatorship in the country for a long time and they supported it with all their power. During the 30-plus-year rule of Mohammad Reza over the country, our material and spiritual sources of wealth were looted. They created a disastrous situation for our people. They kept them in poverty and ignorance, they promoted public corruption in all bases of the country and they truly destroyed the culture of the country, the people\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s religion and everything. This was done with the support of the same western governments. They created as many obstacles as they could during their confrontation with the Iranian peoples\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' Revolution and great movement. They supported and defended Saddam Hussein although they did not approve of him. Because Saddam was against the Islamic Republic, they helped him as much as they could. Westerners, England, America and France provided him with chemical bombs and different kinds of military weapons. Well, these are our experiences. Westoxicated intellectuals do not benefit from these experiences and they do not analyze them correctly because their calculation system has been disrupted. One of the most important services of the Islamic Revolution was reviving true logic and reason in the country. The fact that you young students analyze regional issues, look at different events with complete precision, identify the enemy, analyze regional events and stand firm shows the reasonable life of a country. It was the Revolution that offered this to us, but today, some people still want to go back to prior conditions. The same westernized orientations - the ones that love the west, that humiliate our people and our achievements and that humiliate national culture and identity to the advantage of western powers - want the same powers to come again and to define and introduce standards for the affairs, culture and orientation of the country. Those who are working against the Islamic Republic under the flag of the bloody enemies of the people of Iran are people who are after dominating the same ignorance - calculational ignorance - and the same satanic temptation that once existed opposed to the rationality of this country. I advise the dear students to strengthen their studies - both on the issue of religious and political areas - as well their scientific work. You should try to strengthen your power of analysis. Of course, when I take a look at students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' statements today, I witness good and outstanding points. This really requires our gratitude. It really requires that we thank God, but you should work on this as much as you can. Today, we did not have the time to discuss different issues of the country. By Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s favor, we will discuss these issues in the other meetings that we will hold with students or other groups of people. Students should provide people with analyses on different issues of the country including social, economic and political issues. The people should be able to benefit from students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' analyses. Students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' power of analysis should be like this. This depends on studying. Therefore, students should study. It should not be the case that students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' outlook is a purely emotional one. Your intellectual products should not only be based on tabloid issues. You should deeply study, think about and discuss issues. Many of the statements that the friends in this meeting discussed are statements that should be resolved in student meetings and in free discussions. I have written this down. The free debates that we brought up and that requires free discussions in academic environments can resolve and clarify many of the issues that the friends discussed in this meeting. Students should be able to find the pros and cons of every issue in their student discussions. Another point that I want to discuss is that competitive discourse in academic environments is a good thing provided that it is accompanied by tolerating the opposing views. One should not become surprised, angry and intimidated at the existence of opponents. None of these three feelings is acceptable in the face of opponents. If we become surprised at the existence of opponents, this means that we are overconfident about ourselves. This is the reason why we are surprised when someone is opposed to us, but there is no room for surprise. Well, every individual, every thought, every movement and every orientation has certain opponents. And it is not the case that we think those opponents are necessarily wrong. This is not the case. There are certain weak points and these weak points make some people oppose us. Therefore, the existence of opponents should not make us surprised, as it should not provoke our anger. We should not become angry at their opposition. Opposition is understandable and acceptable. We should not be intimidated either. Being afraid of the existence of opponents shows that we are not confident about the power and strength of our position. This should not be the case. We have a reason. We should strengthen and build up the bases of our reason and then we should enter the arena of competitive discourse and engage in discussion. The spirit of students should be like this. Therefore, academic environments should continue working with the same spirit that they thankfully enjoy today. They should tolerate one another, they should speak to one another, they should discuss different issues with one another and they should strengthen the bases. In practical areas, the basis of their work should be piety and in intellectual areas, the basis of their work should be observing Islamic limits, knowing the enemy and knowing the methods that he uses for showing his enmity. I hope that Allah the Exalted bestows success on all of you and preserves you youth for furthering the goals of the Revolution. I hope that He increases your achievements on a daily basis. I hope that by Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s favor, you youth create a good future for your Revolution and for your country. Greetings be upon you and Allah\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s mercy and blessings.

#کلام #theology_of_islam #اصول #Allmasyedahmednaqvi (سعيدي مهر) #monotheism #علم_کلام #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi أهم محاضرة للعلامة سيد احمد علي نقوي عن التوحيد , مهما سمعتها فلن تمل منها توحيد الألوهية تعليم الاطفال مبادئ التوحيد Teaching children the principles of Islam| الله خالقنا توحيد الربوبية The Philosophy of Kalam علم الكلام تعريفه وموضوعه وفائدته \\ دورة علم العقيدة المستوى الأول علم الكلام ،، ماهيته وأهمينه - أ 7دروس في كتاب خلاصة علم الكلام للعلامة السيد احمد علي نبقوي الدرس ALLAH Ka Wajood | اللہ کا وجود | Does God exist? کیا اللہ کا وجود ہے؟ ، क्या ईश्वर मौजूद है ? EP-7 BY ALLAMA SYED AHMED ALI NAQVI Studying Theology and Religion Basic Beliefs of Islam Studying Theology and Religion at PhD level Al-Ghazali\'s Philosophical Theology Perspectives in Muslim Theology- Theological Foundations- Part 7- Lecture 7 What is PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY? What does PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY mean? Intro to Philosophical Theology Orthodox Christian Theology - About Islam Muslim Theology and Islamic Mysticism - Part 1 of 2 (Understanding Islam Series Philosophy Series - Part 7 [God and the problem of evil] - Theodicy of Mulla Sadra ma\'rifat al nafs How Is Hellfire Explained By Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra? ILM Al KALAM Ki Bunyad , Maqsad Aur Afadiyat - Muqaddama e ilm e Kalam/ مقدمہ علم کلام, Lecture 2, By Ustad SyedAHMED NAQVI QOM Ilm Al Kalaam - Dr. SYED Ahmed Ye Tauheed Hain || Short Clip|| Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI || Power of Emaan توحيد کیا هے - Tawheed kiya hai - What is tawheed answered in urdu - By Dr SYED AHMED NAQVI Tawheed kise kehte hain Tauheed kiya hai / توحید کیا ہے / तौहीद किया है / What is tawheed ? By IACTV _ Tauheed Series - 7 Tauheed | Tawheed | توحید | By SYED Ahmed NAQVI #QOM ALLAH Ko Pehchano Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVIl Very Beautiful Bayan Main ne Allah ko Donda Powerful reminder] ALLAH ko chhorh ke kahan jaoge ??? Khuda Ko Kis Ne Banaya? Who Created God? | Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI Allah अल्लाह कौन हैं اللہ کون ہے || zaroor sunna Ek Bar || Dark Mystery Tauheed name meaning Tauheed naam ka matlab kya hai Tawheed Kya Hai Aur Kise Kehte Hai By SYED AHMED NAQVI توحید کا مفہوم Tohid ka matlab तौहीद का अर्थ

#خدا_شناسي #کلام_اسلامي #Allmasyedahmednaqvi kalam-e-islami || Theology of islam lecture no1 (سعيدي مهر) #monotheism #علم_کلام #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi أهم محاضرة للعلامة سيد احمد علي نقوي عن التوحيد , مهما سمعتها فلن تمل منها توحيد الألوهية تعليم الاطفال مبادئ التوحيد Teaching children the principles of Islam| الله خالقنا توحيد الربوبية The Philosophy of Kalam علم الكلام تعريفه وموضوعه وفائدته \\ دورة علم العقيدة المستوى الأول علم الكلام ،، ماهيته وأهمينه - أ 7دروس في كتاب خلاصة علم الكلام للعلامة السيد احمد علي نبقوي الدرس ALLAH Ka Wajood | اللہ کا وجود | Does God exist? کیا اللہ کا وجود ہے؟ ، क्या ईश्वर मौजूद है ? EP-7 BY ALLAMA SYED AHMED ALI NAQVI Studying Theology and Religion Basic Beliefs of Islam Studying Theology and Religion at PhD level Al-Ghazali\'s Philosophical Theology Perspectives in Muslim Theology- Theological Foundations- Part 7- Lecture 7 What is PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY? What does PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY mean? Intro to Philosophical Theology Orthodox Christian Theology - About Islam Muslim Theology and Islamic Mysticism - Part 1 of 2 (Understanding Islam Series Philosophy Series - Part 7 [God and the problem of evil] - Theodicy of Mulla Sadra ma\'rifat al nafs How Is Hellfire Explained By Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra? ILM Al KALAM Ki Bunyad , Maqsad Aur Afadiyat - Muqaddama e ilm e Kalam/ مقدمہ علم کلام, Lecture 2, By Ustad SyedAHMED NAQVI QOM Ilm Al Kalaam - Dr. SYED Ahmed Ye Tauheed Hain || Short Clip|| Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI || Power of Emaan توحيد کیا هے - Tawheed kiya hai - What is tawheed answered in urdu - By Dr SYED AHMED NAQVI Tawheed kise kehte hain Tauheed kiya hai / توحید کیا ہے / तौहीद किया है / What is tawheed ? By IACTV _ Tauheed Series - 7 Tauheed | Tawheed | توحید | By SYED Ahmed NAQVI #QOM ALLAH Ko Pehchano Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVIl Very Beautiful Bayan Main ne Allah ko Donda Powerful reminder] ALLAH ko chhorh ke kahan jaoge ??? Khuda Ko Kis Ne Banaya? Who Created God? | Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI Allah अल्लाह कौन हैं اللہ کون ہے || zaroor sunna Ek Bar || Dark Mystery Tauheed name meaning Tauheed naam ka matlab kya hai Tawheed Kya Hai Aur Kise Kehte Hai By SYED AHMED NAQVI توحید کا مفہوم Tohid ka matlab तौहीद का अर्थ

#علم_الکلام #برهان_امکان_ووجوب #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi is ders main burhane imkano wujob ko bayan kiya gya hay khuda par kuch dlel hain un main say aik b urhan imkano wjoob hay #monotheism #علم_کلام #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi أهم محاضرة للعلامة سيد احمد علي نقوي عن التوحيد , مهما سمعتها فلن تمل منها توحيد الألوهية تعليم الاطفال مبادئ التوحيد Teaching children the principles of Islam| الله خالقنا توحيد الربوبية The Philosophy of Kalam علم الكلام تعريفه وموضوعه وفائدته \\ دورة علم العقيدة المستوى الأول علم الكلام ،، ماهيته وأهمينه - أ 7دروس في كتاب خلاصة علم الكلام للعلامة السيد احمد علي نبقوي الدرس ALLAH Ka Wajood | اللہ کا وجود | Does God exist? کیا اللہ کا وجود ہے؟ ، क्या ईश्वर मौजूद है ? EP-7 BY ALLAMA SYED AHMED ALI NAQVI Studying Theology and Religion Basic Beliefs of Islam Studying Theology and Religion at PhD level Al-Ghazali\'s Philosophical Theology Perspectives in Muslim Theology- Theological Foundations- Part 7- Lecture 7 What is PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY? What does PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY mean? Intro to Philosophical Theology Orthodox Christian Theology - About Islam Muslim Theology and Islamic Mysticism - Part 1 of 2 (Understanding Islam Series Philosophy Series - Part 7 [God and the problem of evil] - Theodicy of Mulla Sadra ma\'rifat al nafs How Is Hellfire Explained By Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra? ILM Al KALAM Ki Bunyad , Maqsad Aur Afadiyat - Muqaddama e ilm e Kalam/ مقدمہ علم کلام, Lecture 2, By Ustad SyedAHMED NAQVI QOM Ilm Al Kalaam - Dr. SYED Ahmed Ye Tauheed Hain || Short Clip|| Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI || Power of Emaan توحيد کیا هے - Tawheed kiya hai - What is tawheed answered in urdu - By Dr SYED AHMED NAQVI Tawheed kise kehte hain Tauheed kiya hai / توحید کیا ہے / तौहीद किया है / What is tawheed ? By IACTV _ Tauheed Series - 7 Tauheed | Tawheed | توحید | By SYED Ahmed NAQVI #QOM ALLAH Ko Pehchano Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVIl Very Beautiful Bayan Main ne Allah ko Donda Powerful reminder] ALLAH ko chhorh ke kahan jaoge ??? Khuda Ko Kis Ne Banaya? Who Created God? | Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI Allah अल्लाह कौन हैं اللہ کون ہے || zaroor sunna Ek Bar || Dark Mystery Tauheed name meaning Tauheed naam ka matlab kya hai Tawheed Kya Hai Aur Kise Kehte Hai By SYED AHMED NAQVI توحید کا مفہوم Tohid ka matlab तौहीद का अर्थ

#خدا_شناسي #کلام_اسلامي #Allmasyedahmednaqvi #monotheism #علم_کلام #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi أهم محاضرة للعلامة سيد احمد علي نقوي عن التوحيد , مهما سمعتها فلن تمل منها توحيد الألوهية تعليم الاطفال مبادئ التوحيد Teaching children the principles of Islam| الله خالقنا توحيد الربوبية The Philosophy of Kalam علم الكلام تعريفه وموضوعه وفائدته \\ دورة علم العقيدة المستوى الأول علم الكلام ،، ماهيته وأهمينه - أ 7دروس في كتاب خلاصة علم الكلام للعلامة السيد احمد علي نبقوي الدرس ALLAH Ka Wajood | اللہ کا وجود | Does God exist? کیا اللہ کا وجود ہے؟ ، क्या ईश्वर मौजूद है ? EP-7 BY ALLAMA SYED AHMED ALI NAQVI Studying Theology and Religion Basic Beliefs of Islam Studying Theology and Religion at PhD level Al-Ghazali\'s Philosophical Theology Perspectives in Muslim Theology- Theological Foundations- Part 7- Lecture 7 What is PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY? What does PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY mean? Intro to Philosophical Theology Orthodox Christian Theology - About Islam Muslim Theology and Islamic Mysticism - Part 1 of 2 (Understanding Islam Series Philosophy Series - Part 7 [God and the problem of evil] - Theodicy of Mulla Sadra ma\'rifat al nafs How Is Hellfire Explained By Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra? ILM Al KALAM Ki Bunyad , Maqsad Aur Afadiyat - Muqaddama e ilm e Kalam/ مقدمہ علم کلام, Lecture 2, By Ustad SyedAHMED NAQVI QOM Ilm Al Kalaam - Dr. SYED Ahmed Ye Tauheed Hain || Short Clip|| Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI || Power of Emaan توحيد کیا هے - Tawheed kiya hai - What is tawheed answered in urdu - By Dr SYED AHMED NAQVI Tawheed kise kehte hain Tauheed kiya hai / توحید کیا ہے / तौहीद किया है / What is tawheed ? By IACTV _ Tauheed Series - 7 Tauheed | Tawheed | توحید | By SYED Ahmed NAQVI #QOM ALLAH Ko Pehchano Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVIl Very Beautiful Bayan Main ne Allah ko Donda Powerful reminder] ALLAH ko chhorh ke kahan jaoge ??? Khuda Ko Kis Ne Banaya? Who Created God? | Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI Allah अल्लाह कौन हैं اللہ کون ہے || zaroor sunna Ek Bar || Dark Mystery Tauheed name meaning Tauheed naam ka matlab kya hai Tawheed Kya Hai Aur Kise Kehte Hai By SYED AHMED NAQVI توحید کا مفہوم Tohid ka matlab तौहीद का अर्थ

#خدا_شناسي #kalam-e-islami #kalam IS DERS M HUM BAYAN KARAIN GYY KAY BURHAN NAZM KIA HAY? #monotheism #علم_کلام #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi أهم محاضرة للعلامة سيد احمد علي نقوي عن التوحيد , مهما سمعتها فلن تمل منها توحيد الألوهية تعليم الاطفال مبادئ التوحيد Teaching children the principles of Islam| الله خالقنا توحيد الربوبية The Philosophy of Kalam علم الكلام تعريفه وموضوعه وفائدته \\ دورة علم العقيدة المستوى الأول علم الكلام ،، ماهيته وأهمينه - أ 7دروس في كتاب خلاصة علم الكلام للعلامة السيد احمد علي نبقوي الدرس ALLAH Ka Wajood | اللہ کا وجود | Does God exist? کیا اللہ کا وجود ہے؟ ، क्या ईश्वर मौजूद है ? EP-7 BY ALLAMA SYED AHMED ALI NAQVI Studying Theology and Religion Basic Beliefs of Islam Studying Theology and Religion at PhD level Al-Ghazali\'s Philosophical Theology Perspectives in Muslim Theology- Theological Foundations- Part 7- Lecture 7 What is PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY? What does PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY mean? Intro to Philosophical Theology Orthodox Christian Theology - About Islam Muslim Theology and Islamic Mysticism - Part 1 of 2 (Understanding Islam Series Philosophy Series - Part 7 [God and the problem of evil] - Theodicy of Mulla Sadra ma\'rifat al nafs How Is Hellfire Explained By Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra? ILM Al KALAM Ki Bunyad , Maqsad Aur Afadiyat - Muqaddama e ilm e Kalam/ مقدمہ علم کلام, Lecture 2, By Ustad SyedAHMED NAQVI QOM Ilm Al Kalaam - Dr. SYED Ahmed Ye Tauheed Hain || Short Clip|| Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI || Power of Emaan توحيد کیا هے - Tawheed kiya hai - What is tawheed answered in urdu - By Dr SYED AHMED NAQVI Tawheed kise kehte hain Tauheed kiya hai / توحید کیا ہے / तौहीद किया है / What is tawheed ? By IACTV _ Tauheed Series - 7 Tauheed | Tawheed | توحید | By SYED Ahmed NAQVI #QOM ALLAH Ko Pehchano Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVIl Very Beautiful Bayan Main ne Allah ko Donda Powerful reminder] ALLAH ko chhorh ke kahan jaoge ??? Khuda Ko Kis Ne Banaya? Who Created God? | Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI Allah अल्लाह कौन हैं اللہ کون ہے || zaroor sunna Ek Bar || Dark Mystery Tauheed name meaning Tauheed naam ka matlab kya hai Tawheed Kya Hai Aur Kise Kehte Hai By SYED AHMED NAQVI توحید کا مفہوم Tohid ka matlab तौहीद का अर्थ

#monotheism #علم_کلام #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi أهم محاضرة للعلامة سيد احمد علي نقوي عن التوحيد , مهما سمعتها فلن تمل منها توحيد الألوهية تعليم الاطفال مبادئ التوحيد Teaching children the principles of Islam| الله خالقنا توحيد الربوبية The Philosophy of Kalam علم الكلام تعريفه وموضوعه وفائدته \\ دورة علم العقيدة المستوى الأول علم الكلام ،، ماهيته وأهمينه - أ 7دروس في كتاب خلاصة علم الكلام للعلامة السيد احمد علي نبقوي الدرس ALLAH Ka Wajood | اللہ کا وجود | Does God exist? کیا اللہ کا وجود ہے؟ ، क्या ईश्वर मौजूद है ? EP-7 BY ALLAMA SYED AHMED ALI NAQVI Studying Theology and Religion Basic Beliefs of Islam Studying Theology and Religion at PhD level Al-Ghazali\'s Philosophical Theology Perspectives in Muslim Theology- Theological Foundations- Part 7- Lecture 7 What is PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY? What does PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY mean? Intro to Philosophical Theology Orthodox Christian Theology - About Islam Muslim Theology and Islamic Mysticism - Part 1 of 2 (Understanding Islam Series Philosophy Series - Part 7 [God and the problem of evil] - Theodicy of Mulla Sadra ma\'rifat al nafs How Is Hellfire Explained By Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra? ILM Al KALAM Ki Bunyad , Maqsad Aur Afadiyat - Muqaddama e ilm e Kalam/ مقدمہ علم کلام, Lecture 2, By Ustad SyedAHMED NAQVI QOM Ilm Al Kalaam - Dr. SYED Ahmed Ye Tauheed Hain || Short Clip|| Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI || Power of Emaan توحيد کیا هے - Tawheed kiya hai - What is tawheed answered in urdu - By Dr SYED AHMED NAQVI Tawheed kise kehte hain Tauheed kiya hai / توحید کیا ہے / तौहीद किया है / What is tawheed ? By IACTV _ Tauheed Series - 7 Tauheed | Tawheed | توحید | By SYED Ahmed NAQVI #QOM ALLAH Ko Pehchano Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVIl Very Beautiful Bayan Main ne Allah ko Donda Powerful reminder] ALLAH ko chhorh ke kahan jaoge ??? Khuda Ko Kis Ne Banaya? Who Created God? | Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI Allah अल्लाह कौन हैं اللہ کون ہے || zaroor sunna Ek Bar || Dark Mystery Tauheed name meaning Tauheed naam ka matlab kya hai Tawheed Kya Hai Aur Kise Kehte Hai By SYED AHMED NAQVI توحید کا مفہوم Tohid ka matlab तौहीद का अर्थ

#علم_کلام #کلام_اسلامي #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi The reason for order in the Qur\'an and hadiths #monotheism #علم_کلام #ilm-e-kalam #Allmasyedahmednaqvi أهم محاضرة للعلامة سيد احمد علي نقوي عن التوحيد , مهما سمعتها فلن تمل منها توحيد الألوهية تعليم الاطفال مبادئ التوحيد Teaching children the principles of Islam| الله خالقنا توحيد الربوبية The Philosophy of Kalam علم الكلام تعريفه وموضوعه وفائدته \\ دورة علم العقيدة المستوى الأول علم الكلام ،، ماهيته وأهمينه - أ 7دروس في كتاب خلاصة علم الكلام للعلامة السيد احمد علي نبقوي الدرس ALLAH Ka Wajood | اللہ کا وجود | Does God exist? کیا اللہ کا وجود ہے؟ ، क्या ईश्वर मौजूद है ? EP-7 BY ALLAMA SYED AHMED ALI NAQVI Studying Theology and Religion Basic Beliefs of Islam Studying Theology and Religion at PhD level Al-Ghazali\'s Philosophical Theology Perspectives in Muslim Theology- Theological Foundations- Part 7- Lecture 7 What is PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY? What does PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY mean? Intro to Philosophical Theology Orthodox Christian Theology - About Islam Muslim Theology and Islamic Mysticism - Part 1 of 2 (Understanding Islam Series Philosophy Series - Part 7 [God and the problem of evil] - Theodicy of Mulla Sadra ma\'rifat al nafs How Is Hellfire Explained By Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra? ILM Al KALAM Ki Bunyad , Maqsad Aur Afadiyat - Muqaddama e ilm e Kalam/ مقدمہ علم کلام, Lecture 2, By Ustad SyedAHMED NAQVI QOM Ilm Al Kalaam - Dr. SYED Ahmed Ye Tauheed Hain || Short Clip|| Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI || Power of Emaan توحيد کیا هے - Tawheed kiya hai - What is tawheed answered in urdu - By Dr SYED AHMED NAQVI Tawheed kise kehte hain Tauheed kiya hai / توحید کیا ہے / तौहीद किया है / What is tawheed ? By IACTV _ Tauheed Series - 7 Tauheed | Tawheed | توحید | By SYED Ahmed NAQVI #QOM ALLAH Ko Pehchano Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVIl Very Beautiful Bayan Main ne Allah ko Donda Powerful reminder] ALLAH ko chhorh ke kahan jaoge ??? Khuda Ko Kis Ne Banaya? Who Created God? | Maulana SYED AHMED NAQVI Allah अल्लाह कौन हैं اللہ کون ہے || zaroor sunna Ek Bar || Dark Mystery Tauheed name meaning Tauheed naam ka matlab kya hai Tawheed Kya Hai Aur Kise Kehte Hai By SYED AHMED NAQVI توحید کا مفہوم Tohid ka matlab तौहीद का अर्थ

DAY 1 - Shahr Ramadhan 2021 Allah and me A series of bite-size videos taking us through a Qur’anic journey regarding our relationship with Allah from different perspectives!

DAY 2 - Shahr Ramadhan 2021 Allah and me A series of bite-size videos taking us through a Qur’anic journey regarding our relationship with Allah from different perspectives!