The Real Criminal Behind ISIS | Bomb Blast In Kabul, Afghanistan | Farsi...
The ugly face of ISIS (Daesh) is obvious for any informed person on the planet today. That said, who is the real criminal behind ISIS? Who...
The ugly face of ISIS (Daesh) is obvious for any informed person on the planet today. That said, who is the real criminal behind ISIS? Who has openly confessed to have created, supported and financed this terrorist organization? Who has benefitted from the evil activities of this terrorist outfit?
Why is there utter silence when it comes to speaking against the planners and executers of this terrorist project ISIS?
ISIS is an official project of the United States of America. It has been supported and funded by the evil Saudi regime. They are the real criminals. They are responsible for devastating and destroying Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen. Countless lives have been lost due to the state sponsored terrorism of the United States of America.
2m:39s
14613
Video Tags:
purestream,
media,
production,
criminal,
ISIS,
bomb
blast,
kabul,
afghanistan,
daesh,
confession,
terrorist
organnization,
evil
activities,
benefit,
silence,
planners,
executers,
official
project,
USA,
funded,
saudi
regime,
real
criminals,
iraq,
syria,
yemen,
lives
lost,
state
sponsored
terrorism,
america,
death
to
america,
american
crimes,
Frequent Suicide Attacks in Afghanistan | Hypocrisy of Western Policy |...
- The unfortunate suicide attacks in Kabul, becoming a regular occurrence in Afghanistan by ISIS affiliates
- The misguided philosophy of these...
- The unfortunate suicide attacks in Kabul, becoming a regular occurrence in Afghanistan by ISIS affiliates
- The misguided philosophy of these groups, leading them attack those who follow the Prophet and the Sunnah closer than them
- The importance of pursuing knowledge for both men and women, not only men
- Examples of this from the time of the Prophet himself, contradictory to the extremist ideologies of today, preventing women from gaining knowledge
- Examining the hypocrisy of US and Western claims of promoting democracy, human rights, and literacy. All of their efforts consist of ulterior motives, and failed attempts which they abandoned
- All US allies in the Muslim world are dictatorships who have no regard for human rights
-
Friday Juma Khutba - September 30th, 2022
Donate towards our programs today: https://jaffari.org/donate/
Jaffari Community Centre (JCC Live)
19m:59s
1692
[17 July 2012] Paying Taliban to lay down arms is not effective - English
[17 July 2012] Paying Taliban to lay down arms is not effective - English
US-led NATO says the strategy of buying the loyalty of Taliban members...
[17 July 2012] Paying Taliban to lay down arms is not effective - English
US-led NATO says the strategy of buying the loyalty of Taliban members in Afghanistan has proved to be a failure as only around 5,000 militants have responded to the strategy by giving up their weapons.
The US-led Western military alliance said that the plan has had very little effect across Afghanistan so far.
The program, which started in October 2010, offers a stipend of USD 360 over three months to each Taliban militant who lays down arms and joins the program.
The US-led invasion of Afghanistan was launched in 2001. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to rise across Afghanistan despite the presence of tens of thousands of US-led troops there.
The US-led war in Afghanistan, with civilian and military casualties at record high, has become one of the longest wars in US history.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Carl Osgood, Executive Intelligence Review, from Washington, to further discuss the issue.
4m:48s
7510
Twelve US-led soldiers killed in 48 hours - 14 July 2010 - English
Five more American soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan's volatile south, bringing to 12 the number of foreign soldiers killed over the...
Five more American soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan's volatile south, bringing to 12 the number of foreign soldiers killed over the past 48 hours.
NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said on Wednesday that four of the soldiers lost their lives in a bomb attack, while the other one was killed in a gunfight with the Taliban in the volatile south.
The latest casualties come a day after seven NATO soldiers -- four British and three American -- were killed in the war-torn country.
Meanwhile, Taliban spokesman Qari Yousuf Ahmadi claimed that militants have killed 13 American troops and seven Afghan soldiers during an attack on a military outpost in Kandahar.
Over 350 foreign troops have been killed in Afghanistan so far this year.
Some 140,000 US-led troops are currently stationed Afghanistan. A further 10,000 are expected to be deployed there in the coming weeks.
NATO's mounting death toll has caused public support to plummet for the Afghan war across Europe and the US.
Meanwhile, results of a CBS poll show most Americans believe the war in Afghanistan is a no-win scenario.
The poll says 60 percent of American people think the war is being handled badly.
Fifty-one percent of Americans want the US government to set a date for the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.
3m:35s
7184
US-led Afghan war is criminal - 03nov2010 - English
Renowned Jewish-American scholar Noam Chomsky says US invasion of Afghanistan was illegal since to date there is no evidence that al-Qaeda has...
Renowned Jewish-American scholar Noam Chomsky says US invasion of Afghanistan was illegal since to date there is no evidence that al-Qaeda has carried out the 9/11 attacks.
"The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States, the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban…they requested evidence…and the Bush administration refused to provide any," the 81-year-old senior academic made the remarks on Press TV's program a Simple Question.
"We later discovered one of the reasons why they did not bring evidence: they did not have any."
The political analyst also said that nonexistence of such evidence was confirmed by FBI eight months later.
"The head of FBI, after the most intense international investigation in history, informed the press that the FBI believed that the plot may have been hatched in Afghanistan, but was probably implemented in the United Arab Emirates and Germany."
Chomsky added that three weeks into the war, "a British officer announced that the US and Britain would continue bombing, until the people of Afghanistan overthrew the Taliban... That was later turned into the official justification for the war."
"All of this was totally illegal. It was more, criminal," Chomsky said.
The 2001 US-led invasion of Afghanistan was launched with the official objective of curbing militancy and bringing peace and stability to the country.
Nine years on, however, the American and Afghan officials admit that the country remains unstable and civilians continue to pay the heaviest price.
2m:3s
12360
[03 Nov 2013] US AfPak envoy acknowledges West costly mistakes in Afghan...
A senior member of the US administration has admitted that the West has made mistakes in the Afghanistan war. US president\'s special...
A senior member of the US administration has admitted that the West has made mistakes in the Afghanistan war. US president\'s special representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan says those mistakes have claimed unnecessary lives and prolonged the war. James Dobbins also said that sidelining Iran and Russia after the invasion of Afghanistan by the U-S and its allies was wrong. Dobbins stressed that Tehran and Moscow can play their part in rebuilding the country after the withdrawal of U-S-led foreign forces from Afghanistan.
3m:28s
5029
Superpowers, AK-47s, and Some Donkeys | Keepin' It Real | English
With all the different current events going on in the world, we all really need a funny, relaxed, refreshing, and yet eye-opening commentary on it...
With all the different current events going on in the world, we all really need a funny, relaxed, refreshing, and yet eye-opening commentary on it all.
Sayyid Shahryar\'s here to humbly shed a little insight into all that\'s going on around the world; past, present, and perhaps even future.
In this episode, we\'re \"Keepin\' It Real\" by talking about \"Superpowers, AK-47s, and Some Donkeys\".
In late 2001, the United States of America and their allies on a global scale, gathered their great armies and attacked the sovereign, yet fearsome nation of Afghanistan.
But after 20 years of occupation, what have the Americans achieved in Afghanistan?
Hey, we\'re just \"Keepin\' It Real\".
#KeepinItReal #KIR #IslamicPulse #NewsCommentary #Islam #Allah #Quran #AhlulBayt #GlobalArrogance #Revolution #Afghanistan #America #WarOnTerror #Terrorism #Satan #Evil #Freedom #Slavery #Humanity #God #Truth
9m:31s
5597
Video Tags:
islamicpulse,
production,
KeepinItReal,
Superpowers,
Superpowers,
Some
Donkeys,
Donkeys,
Afghanistan,
America,
NewsCommentary,
Terrorism,
WarOnTerror,
Freedom,
Slavery,
Islam,
eye-opening
commentary,
Allah,
GlobalArrogance,
AK-47,
GUN,
Sayyid
Shahryar\'s,
attacked,
funny,
funny
NewsCommentary,
relaxed,
present,
Keepin,
nation
of
Afghanistan,
eye-opening,
[Must Watch] Wars could cost over $4 trillion - English
Although a new study has doubled the US war costs, it does not account for the enormous subsequent expenses for the injured troops, a US analyst...
Although a new study has doubled the US war costs, it does not account for the enormous subsequent expenses for the injured troops, a US analyst says.
"The cost of taking care of [the injured troops] … has not really been taken into account seriously, either by economists or by political figures in the United States," historian and investigative journalist Gareth Porter told Press TV on Thursday.
The new study, conducted by the Nobel Prize winner for economics Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard University Professor Linda Bilmes, shows that the long-term costs of the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq doubles initial estimates, suggesting the revised six-trillion-dollar figure.
The analyst also warned that "the institutional interests of the military itself [is] so enormous that the [US] military is absolutely determined to avoid an end to this war any time soon."
Porter called on the people and the politicians in the United States to take action to make their government bring the wars to an end.
http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/144762.html
****************
Wars could cost over $4 trillion
Authors of the book The Three Trillion Dollar War now estimate that the total cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could top $4 trillion over time. A lagging economy, increases in the cost of medical care, higher than expected expenditures on post-combat medical and psychiatric care, and a surge in disability benefits are likely to place a significant strain on the federal budget.
House Veterans Affairs Chairman, Bob Filner (D-California), stated:
"This may be more of a crisis than the Medicare and Social Security problems we have looming...It rivals both in the potential impact. This is another entitlement we've committed ourselves to, and it could break the bank."
Filner aims on utilizing the latest cost estimates to propose a "veterans trust fund" to pay for the long-term war expenses, a proposal that has so far found minimal support in the Democratic-led House due to the startling price tag associated with it.
Having already blown past original cost projections, combat operations alone in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan have cost nearly $1.1 trillion in nine years. With well over 30,000 maimed for life, a PTSD epidemic, and record suicide rates (in the military), an estimated price tag of at least $4 trillion over the next several years appears to be reasonable.
As a result, those who claim to be fiscally conservative should take a long hard look at the immense cost of open-ended, overseas wars, especially at a time when America could be facing a debt crisis in the not-too-distant future. Vague objectives, shifting benchmarks, imprecise definitions of victory, and unclear exit strategies inevitably lead to costs that far exceed initial budget estimates.
In addition, those who claim to espouse a more progressive, anti-war stance should take a long hard look at the current war policy, as the trillions being spent could be better invested in infrastructure, health care, education, alternative energy, and other domestic programs. Perhaps the strategy of electing leaders who espouse peace, fiscal responsibility, and change in U.S. foreign policy, yet intensify wars, spend even more on the military, and adopt much of their despised opponents' previous platform, should be more critically examined.
http://caivn.org/article/2010/09/30/wars-could-cost-over-4-trillion
2m:52s
13185
[26 May 2012] Strategic partnership or Sovereignty Setback - News...
[26 May 2012] Strategic partnership or Sovereignty Setback - News Analysis - English
A strategic partnership that would provide a framework for...
[26 May 2012] Strategic partnership or Sovereignty Setback - News Analysis - English
A strategic partnership that would provide a framework for Afghanistan's future relationship with the US: Signed by presidents of the US and Afghanistan, and just ratified in the Afghan parliament: Even the name, however, sets the framework for US presence in Afghanistan: Enduring Strategic Partnership Agreement, which, when broken down, would ensure presence of American forces in the country though 2014 and even beyond. In this news analysis, we will look at why a US troop withdrawal and handover to Afghan forces may be just cosmetic, and why facts on the ground indicate a much longer US presence in that country, such as their numerous military bases.
25m:3s
5705
[12 Aug 2012] Afghan freedom depends on US interests - News Analysis -...
[12 Aug 2012] Afghan freedom depends on US interests - English
More than a decade in Afghanistan the US-led forces are now facing more violence....
[12 Aug 2012] Afghan freedom depends on US interests - English
More than a decade in Afghanistan the US-led forces are now facing more violence. As many as eight US-led troopers have been killed by locals in southern Afghanistan over the past three days in the so-called "green-on-blue" attacks. In two separate incidents on Friday, three American forces were shot by a man in Afghan police uniform, who had invited them to a meal, while three other troopers were killed by an Afghan, employed in a NATO base.
According to a NATO count, green-on-blue attacks, in which Afghans turn their weapons against the foreign forces, have killed a total of 34 foreign troopers this year. The inspector general police of the Helmand province, Abdul Nabi Ilham described the green-on-blue attacks as a new tactic of the Taliban. Thousands of NATO troopers, due to withdraw from Afghanistan in 2014, are still in the country under the pretext of 'training and working alongside Afghan soldiers' for the anti-insurgency campaign.
23m:21s
5791
[19 Nov 2013] US Natl. Security Adviser: US will not apologize to...
A top White House official says Washington does not need to apologize to Afghanistan for over a decade of killing and injuring civilians in the...
A top White House official says Washington does not need to apologize to Afghanistan for over a decade of killing and injuring civilians in the war-torn country. National Security Advisor Susan Rice made the remarks following reports that US President Barack Obama would apologize for the United States\' mistakes. Earlier, an Afghan presidential spokesman said that as a part of the Washington-Kabul security pact, the U-S would write a letter admitting the errors it made during its war in Afghanistan. But according to Rice, no letter has been drafted and it is off the table. Meanwhile, a group of Afghan elders known as the Loya Jirga will discuss the so-called Bilateral Security Agreement between the two countries on Thursday. If confirmed, the strategic partnership deal will allow US troops to stay in the country beyond the 2014 planned pullout and grant them immunity from prosecution in Afghanistan.
3m:31s
5673